November 13th, 2007 by Critical Times
By James Kanter
The International Herald Tribune
25 October 2007
Paris – The human population is living far beyond its means and inflicting damage to the environment that could pass points of no return, according to a major report being issued today by the United Nations.
Climate change, the rate of extinction of species, and the challenge of feeding a growing population are among the threats putting humanity at risk, according to the United Nations Environment Program in its fourth Global Environmental Outlook since 1997.
“The human population is now so large that the amount of resources needed to sustain it exceeds what is available at current consumption patterns,” Achim Steiner, the executive director of the Environment Program, said in a telephone interview. Efficient use of resources and reducing waste now are “among the greatest challenges at the beginning in of 21st century,” he said.
The program described its report, which is prepared by 388 experts and scientists, as the broadest and deepest of those the United Nations has issued on the environment and called it “the final wake-up call to the international community.” Many biologists and climate scientists have concluded recently that human activities have become a dominant influence on the planet’s climate and ecosystems. Underscoring the depth of those concerns was the recent award of the Nobel Peace Prize to former Vice President Al Gore and to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations network of scientists that the Environment Program helped found and helps finance. But there is still a range of views on whether the altering climate could result in a catastrophic depletion of natural resources as the human population heads toward 9 billion by mid-century, or more of a steady diminution in diversity.
Over the last two decades the world population has already increased by almost 34 percent, to 6.7 billion from 5 billion. But the land available to each person is shrinking, from 19.5 acres in 1900 to 5 acres by 2005, and is projected to drop to 4 acres by 2050, the report said.
Population growth combined with unsustainable consumption has resulted in an increasingly stressed planet where natural disasters and environmental degradation endanger millions of human beings as well as plant and animal species, the report said.
Persistent problems identified by the report include a rapid rise of so-called dead zones, where marine life no longer can be supported because of depleted oxygen levels from pollutants such as fertilizers, as well as the resurgence of diseases linked with environmental degradation.
The report comes two decades after a commission chaired by the former Norwegian prime minister, Gro Harlem Brundtland, warned that the survival of humanity was at stake from unsustainable development.
Mr. Steiner said many of the problems the Brundtland Commission identified were even more acute now because not enough had been done to stop environmental degradation while flows of goods, services, people, technologies and workers has expanded, even to isolated populations.
He did, however, identify pockets of hope, noting that Western European governments had taken effective measures to reduce air pollutants and that Brazil had made efforts to roll back some deforestation in the Amazon. He said an international treaty to tackle the hole in the earth’s ozone layer had led to the phasing out of 95 percent of ozone-damaging chemicals.
“Life would be easier if we didn’t have the kind of population growth rates that we have at the moment,” Mr. Steiner said, “But to force people to stop having children would be simplistic answer. The more realistic, ethical and practical issue is to accelerate human well being and make more rational use of the resources we have on this planet.”
Mr. Steiner said parts of Africa could reach an environmental tipping point if changing rainfall patterns stemming from climate change turned semi-arid zones into arid zones and made the agriculture that sustains millions of people much harder.
Mr. Steiner said another tipping point could occur in India and China if Himalayan glaciers shrink so much that they no longer supply adequate amounts of water to populations in those countries.
He also warned of a global collapse of all species being fished by 2050, if fishing around the world continued at its present pace.
The report said 250 percent more fish are being caught than the oceans can produce in a sustainable manner, and that the level of global fish stocks classed as collapsed had roughly doubled to 30 percent over the past 20 years.
The report said that current changes in biodiversity were the fastest in human history, with species becoming extinct a hundred times faster than the rate in the fossil record. It said 12 percent of birds are threatened with extinction; for mammals the figure is 23 percent and for amphibians it is more than 30 percent.
“Scientists now refer to a sixth major extinction crisis that’s under way,” Steiner said.
The first mass extinction, about 440 million years ago, and the four succeeding extinctions were the result of physical shocks to the planet like volcanic eruptions and plate tectonic shifts.
The report said that annual emissions of
CO2 from fossil fuels have risen by about one-third since 1987 and that the threat from climate change now was so urgent that only very large cuts in greenhouse gases of 60 to 80 percent could stop irreversible change.
The effects of global warming, like the melting ice in the Arctic are “accelerating at a pace that goes beyond the scenarios and models we’ve been using,” Steiner said.
Climate change, however, was an issue that gained huge momentum over the past year, with governments, industries and citizens increasingly seeking solutions to the problem, Steiner said. The recent award of the Nobel Peace Prize to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and to former Vice President Al Gore was a sign of widespread scientific consensus that climate change is under way, he said.
Steiner called for an accelerated effort on a far wider range of environmental issues to build the same sense of urgency as shown on climate change over the past year to address the worsening situations of biodiversity, land degradation, fisheries and freshwater.
Many biologists and climate scientists have concluded that human activities have become a dominant influence on the planet’s climate and ecosystems. But there is still a range of views on whether this could result in a catastrophic unraveling of natural resources as the human population heads toward nine billion by midcentury, or more of a steady diminution in diversity.
Posted in International |
Tags
climate, change, extinction, humanity, population, resources, collapse, species, biodiversity
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
November 13th, 2007 at 10:11 pm
[...] Оригинал сообщения от Critical Times тут… [...]
December 7th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
A nice report, blame the problems on the people, population problems not the crazy exploitative of labour and nature unnecessary waste creating for profit system of capitalism.
Overproduction of capital in the hands of the wealthy creates overproduction of goods that cannot easily be sold at a good profit and unnecessary wasteful consumption is encouraged with advertising creating new ” needs” and expand markets. Credit to those who can afford it for this consumption is extended in order to create more profits. So the wealthy of the world the imperialist nations are the main consumers and have created the bulk of this unnecessary consumption with its huge pollution and environmental damages.
The capitalist individualist consumption lifestyle now threatens human existence itself.
A lot of the environmental costs of this excessive consumption are imposed on the third world They get the dirtiest factories(export all pulp mills) and their forests and other natural resources are plundered at will by imperialism.
It is a system based on ‘free trade” in poverty creation by exploiting labour. The oppressed world and their “cheap” value creating labour is the result. Terrible social and environmental conditions exist ,for the majority of the worlds peoples, the poor. They are the proletariat exploited by the imperialist “free trade” system of capitalism.
This “free trade” has the surface appearance of a globalist trade in goods .
But is really in its essence the trade for profit/surplus value /extra products exploited from the underpaid labour value and so “cheap labour” export driven economies . The majority of the industrial proletariat now lives and works in the third world.
Have a look at the value of wages in China and of other third world peoples and look at the origin of the goods in the shops you buy. Marx said that surplus value created by exploited labour is embodied in the commodities during the production process and this surplus value is realised at the final sale of the commodities and called profit.
Production under capitalism is not to serve real human needs but to produce profits for capital.
So who are these wealthy consumers?
The Economist on 7.12 .O6 reports
“MUCH of Adam Smith’s classic treatise on the “Wealth of Nations” is not really
about wealth at all, but about income. The two concepts are different: income is
the flow of money a nation or household receives in a year; wealth is the stock
of assets it has accumulated over its life so far, minus its debts.
The difference matters but how much so is hard to say. The global distribution
of income has been noisily debated; the distribution of wealth ignored.
Economists can talk (and argue) only about what they can measure, and whereas
they struggle to measure global income inequality, they have barely ventured to
do the same for wealth. Until now…. The World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) in Helsinki this week released a bold attempt to measure how personal wealth (which includes financial assets, real estate, consumer durables and even livestock) was distributed around the world in 2000.
What do they find? If you had more than $2,161 (measured by official exchange
rates) in 2000, you belonged to the wealthier half of the human race.
Were you lucky enough to own more than $515,000, you could hobnob with the top 1% (although this is a “far from exclusive club”, containing 37m adults). The top ranks are still dominated by the Americans, Japanese and Europeans (see chart). China occupies the middle ground. Wealth is shared much less equitably than income: more than half of it is held by just 2% of the world’s adults.
The distribution is equivalent to a world of ten people, in which one had $1,000 and the other nine had $1 each.
Many people in poor countries have next-to-nothing; but quite a lot of people in rich countries have less than that: their liabilities exceed their assets.”
This accumulated wealth is the material basis of capital. Ownership of that capital determines distribution and consumption of the wealth created.
For the majority of the worlds population the problem is capitalist exploitation and the wasteful excessive consumption of the wealth their labour creates is the major cause of humanities environmental problems. These poor people do not get to consume much at all. They are left with little effective demand.
So population is hardly the big problem creating the environmental mess.
Here we see that the principal contradiction (problem)in the world today is between the oppressed peoples of the world and the imperialists . Their profit driven system uses their accumulated wealth to dominate the worlds oppressed people and the system they have created exploits people at any cost to the Human environment
The problems in the environment are not a problem of human population but a
problem created by the exploitation of the worlds population by the holders of wealth in the form of capital .
Only with the oppressed of the world getting that profit crazy system off their backs can the problems of the human
environment be solved and any population problems be managed in a sane way.
Those in the imperialist countries concerned about environmental problems and global warming should unite with the proletariat, the oppressed peoples,to end exploitation of labour and the globalise imperialist/capitalist system
.Both movements have the same problem and the same solution.
Strange as it may seem the solution to the human environmental crisis can only be solved by, as a Marx said,inscribing on our banners the abolition of the wages system of capitalism.